Global Frontier Advisory and Development Services

Our Blog

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • What We Do
    • Programmes
    • Partnerships
  • Resources
    • How We Take Action
    • Photo and Video Gallery
  • Contact Us
  • Blog

2/20/2020

Further Considerations in GUYANA’s Impending Bonanza from Oil and the Political Storm

3 Comments

Read Now
 
Picture
GOFAD out of an abundance of caution in interpreting the myriad of conflicting information, steered clear of the echo chamber of  ‘self styled experts’ and ‘media huskers and hustlers’ that may be capitalizing on the political storm on the eve of the Guyana’s General Elections on March 2, 2020. It advocated that discussions on the way forward needs to place the objectives of the National Resource Fund (Sovereign Wealth Fund) Act in the broader context of Guyana's sustainable development. These include: 
  • The  strategic thinking of those countries particularly China, Russia and US whose self-interest would  embroil Guyana in the re-emergence of the Cold War. 
  • Awareness of USA and its new strategic interest in Guyana — beyond enriching US Gulf Coast refiners — which involves  it taking note of China’s growing presence in the Western Hemisphere as one of the most obvious options for financing. China’s  potential for furthering  ties with Guyana should be no exception.
  • The lingering effects of Venezuela Petro Caribe and Oil diplomacy  matched by Venezuela’s claims to the vast expanse of Guyana's territory now to be litigated in the International Court and the role of Russia as a patron of the current Madura regime in Venezuela. 
  • Many global institutions like the World Bank, as well as governments and proponents  of sovereign wealth funds, are now climate conscious — reticent to finance infrastructure that will increase the world’s carbon footprint
Following up this week,  we draw on the opinions of two highly acclaimed economists, Professors Clive Thomas and Havelock Brewster.

Interrelations of Government Take

 Clive Thomas in an insightful article in the Guyana’s Sunday Stabroek News (February 16, 2019 p.13) referred to the debate on the Guyana 'Government’s Take'  of the impending oil bonanza as disappointingly “more noise and nonsense". He points out that the arguments in the debate generally fail to recognize the technical component and the challenges of measuring ‘Government Take’ which is a price “determined by forces of demand and supply in an economic market worldwide.” He illustrates that the owners of the supply of petroleum acreage negotiate the fiscal terms and other conditions for granting permission to explore and that these fiscal terms and conditions include bonuses, rentals, royalties and production sharing agreements (PSAs).  They also include investment incentives and the price the investor must pay to explore and develop the acreage.

Rystad Energy, an independent oil and gas consultancy service  provides a comparison of total government take from several upstream projects in selected countries and shows that Guyana with 60% compares favourably with Brazil 63% and Suriname 65% and is higher than USA 57% and Israel 55%.  But Thomas cautions that Guyana’s fiscal terms differ from those of other countries “irrespective of the competitiveness of these terms”. The significant lesson from Thomas’ analysis is that the fiscal terms are certain to be adjusted in time, since Guyana’s PSA is a dynamic document open to change and improvement.  




Greater focus on the Context of the Negotiations

At the same time, a comment by Professor Havelock Brewster provides a sanguine interpretation of the context of Guyana’s negotiation with Exxon.  He is of the view that the Guyana Government and its advisers had little or no access to insider information, nor the capacity to verify any of the crucial variables such as the amount of capital and start up cost; or the amount of output, operational cost, pricing and revenue. This is a true reflection of the adage ‘the devil is in the detail’. His view is that Guyana was treading in circumstances of ‘the unknown’.  In this regard, the view from The Global Witness report that Guyana could have secured a much better percentage of “revenue”, more in line with that of other oil producing countries, needs further scrutiny. Brewster points out that consideration must be given to both the prevailing internal political issues, and the international issues. He concludes that this brings to the fore the nexus of concerns about Exxon negotiating strategy and leverage, the ongoing International Court case on the Venezuelan claim, Guaido’s close relationship with the US President, with strong support coming from both the Republican and Democratic Parties, emboldening Guaido ‘s claim that the oil belongs to Venezuela, and the effect of Russia’s and China’s backing of Maduro and the US stance on Venezuela vs Guyana. “All this must create considerable uncertainty, and political limits to driving too hard a bargain with Exxon. To put it simply, there must be, in such circumstances, a leaning towards locking in the deal, even at some cost, going for the bird in the hand rather the bird in the bush”.  He goes further by indicating that the gamble could be obtaining the ideal or ending up with zero and states that “no other oil producing country, to my knowledge, has faced this kind of one-sided uncertainty in negotiating with Exxon”.

Charting the Way Forward 

As Guyana moves forward with securing its best interest, it is estimated that it will realize US$165billion over the life of the present contract with Exxon.  How it utilizes the oil bonanza to benefit the Guyanese people will be further explored. As a starter it will depend on the following: 
  •  Application of the provisions for good governance and transparency enshrined in the Act establishing the National Resource Fund (NRF). 
  • Examination of  the proposals for cash transfers and carbon taxes, among others. 
  • Consideration of  the political and strategic influence in the continuing contest between Venezuela, intent on reviving Petro Caribe and USA anti Madura stance. 
  • Engagement in  CARICOM for implementing the  Caribbean Energy Policy, which includes an MOU with Trinidad and Tobago for technical assistance.
  • Recognition that the Caribbean is being heralded as the next oil and gas province attracting the attention of the world's largest oil companies, with possibilities for capital and technical transfers to the region as a whole. 

These contending tendencies could  have wider and long lasting implications. CARICOM member states may yet find themselves with a fragmented rather than a cohesive foreign policy.  And this will not augur well, neither for Guyana nor CARICOM.


Eddie Greene

Share

3 Comments
Abryan39@gmail;.com
2/20/2020 01:44:49 pm

Excellent observations Eddie. On point and an important reality check by both Clive and Havelock. At some stage hyperbole (much conveyed in the media or by overnight experts) should not be a substitute for caution, and careful analysis.
Thanjs for sharing.
Tony

Reply
sroopnauth@tinance.gov.gy
2/22/2020 09:26:51 am

Thank you for sharing. Just read. Very good views to juxtapose indeed.

Two comments -
1. PSA not very dynamic but certainly correct interpretation is key esp for profit share calculation and cost oil calculation ie what is deemed recoverable costs and what is not. However a model PSA is being drafted for future investments and it is possible in time and subject to political will to renegotiate aspects of current PSA given the de-risked nature of the area. Just fyi MoF sourced expert via IMF in 2018 and 2019 to train key officials in Govt MoF/GRA/DE/Att Gen on PSA interpretation and has retained expertise for rest of year 2020 to support interpretation/negotiation of various articles in the PSA. In addition DE in late 2019 has sourced expertise (via World Bank support) through a firm Clyde &Co to support PSA interpretation and implementation.
2. Some additional bullets for consideration re "how it utilises oil bonanza to benefit the Guyanese people will depend on..."
the effective management of expenditure through the national budget and increased focus on institutional strengthening
the strategic spending to rapidly reform the education system from early childhood to tertiary as the underpinning sector that will determine national transformation
effective policy responses to mitigate the inevitable dutch disease


Sonya

Reply
Fitzgerald John Yaw
3/4/2020 04:55:27 am

Greetings,
Most folks would agree that Guyana is on a steep learning curve re the oil industry and has the challenge of the Venezuelan claim on the one hand and its fractured politics on the other. I would only add that in relation to spending on education, especially at the tertiary level the country must look at the cost benefits and be wise about how we retain some of the expenditure by the people of Guyana through the government on tertiary education. Put simply we have to put systems in place to ensure that persons educated at tertiary level with dollars of the Guyanese people serve Guyana and not leave on completion of their tertiary education in Guyana to help other countries develop first. One of the major current challenges of Guyana is the low level of education of its employed work force compared to its regional peers, and other countries.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

Details

    Author 

    Edward and Auriol Greene Directors, GOFAD.

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    July 2018
    June 2018

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Global Frontier Site Links

Home
Who We Are
What We Do
​Programmes
How We Take Action
Partnerships
Resources
Contact Us

Contact Information

Email: info@GOFAD.org
​
Twitter: @GofadGlobal
Global Frontier logo
© 2021 Global Frontier  |  Sitemap
Site powered by Weebly. Managed by FreeLogoServices.com
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • What We Do
    • Programmes
    • Partnerships
  • Resources
    • How We Take Action
    • Photo and Video Gallery
  • Contact Us
  • Blog